Do you truly assess the capabilities of a measurement system before you start your experiments? It is far more realistic to base your experimental design on "real-world" data—even if it's lower quality, like the datasets other researchers have actually uploaded to public databases—rather than the "flawless" data presented by sales representatives.
The Danger of "Polished" Demo Data
Sales teams often showcase data generated under ideal, cherry-picked conditions. However, your actual samples will have noise, biological variation, and technical artifacts. By using public databases (such as GEO or TCGA) to simulate your study with existing datasets of varying quality, you can identify which platform or method will actually deliver the level of data you need.
Save Time and Budget Before It’s Too Late
Pinpointing the right methodology through pre-assessment can reliably save you a significant amount of time and money. Don't wait until you've spent thousands of dollars to find out your chosen platform can't detect the signals you're looking for. Furthermore, there are specific "hacks" in experimental design that can minimize risks while keeping costs under control. At Subio, we provide these strategic insights to ensure your research stays on track without breaking the bank.
How Subio Can Help
With our Data Analysis Service
, we can perform these detailed assessments for you at a fraction of the cost of a failed experiment. We help you look past the marketing and see how a platform performs under realistic, challenging conditions.
Ensure your experimental success by knowing the ground truth before you start. [Contact us for a pre-experiment assessment].
We hope the following topics also help you.
- How is the quality of single cell RNA-Seq actually?
- Quantity Matters for Quality of RNA-Seq Data
- Gene Expression vs. Exon Expression Microarrays
- Be careful of using microRNA expression datasets.
- Comparing Bisulphite Sequencing And Methylation Array
How to assess gene expression platforms?
How to assess CGH platforms?